The emergency relief granted a motion to expedite, meaning Thurston will have until Monday, July 29 to perform the initial count of signatures collected by volunteer canvassers and provide the state supreme court with the findings.

The state Supreme Court also said a part of the motion of emergency relief could grant the petitioner, Arkansans for Limited Government, a thirty-day provisional cure period, meaning they will have 30 days starting Monday to collect the signatures they think they will need to fulfill the requirements for it to go on the ballot this November.

  • Omega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    So, I’ve already signed this. Any way to tell if mine was one of the signatures that were thrown out?

    • Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      As far as i know (and not a lawyer), nothing is getting thrown out now. The court ordered the ag to count all signatures. The extra 30 days are just standard, and most likely not needed here.

        • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          You are correct.

          The order specifies signatures collected by volunteer canvassers. Because it does not specify all signatures, or explicitly includes those collected by paid canvassers, it’s likely the Secretary of State would omit those from their count.

          It’s unclear what the 30-day provisional cure period would entail. It could simply be that they have 30 days to resubmit with the “missing” paperwork*, or 30 days to collect additional signatures, or merely 30 days to continue to argue in the courts.

          * I’d like to highlight that the folks behind the campaign submitted all the necessary paperwork on June 27th, and they say they were told that they were not required to submit that paperwork again on July 5th, when they submitted the signatures.
          That this is even an issue reeks of malfeasance and bureaucratic dumbfuckery. It should have been resolved quickly and quietly to allow the people of Arkansas a chance to directly participate in their legislative process.

          • Omega@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            A similar issue happened when medical cannabis was legalized. There were two competing amendments. The more popular amendment had more allowances. After the deadline for signatures, the state threw out whole pages for any issues with any signature they found.

            So all that was left was the more restrictive amendment.