Firefox now collects data for advertisers. It's not actually scary, but there is a bigger problem.
  • tyler@programming.dev
    33·
    3 months ago

    I do know that Mozilla’s Privacy Preserving Attribution is not something you should worry about. I also know if someone calls it the “enshitification of Firefox” or the work of an “anti-privacy, pro-advertising cabal,” they’re either ignorant or simply looking for rage bait clicks from angry Linux users.

    Yup

  • TemporalSoup@beehaw.org
    25·
    3 months ago

    I don’t remember who I heard say it, but someone said Mozilla should have built a privacy-first Google ecosystem alternative similar to what Proton are doing, which could have allowed them to actually make some money outside of their Google search bribe money.

    But it’s too late for that now I guess :(

      • mayooooo@beehaw.org
        8·
        3 months ago

        Wait was it privacy or was it having an intrusive “ai” bullshit thing? I can’t remember exactly Jokes aside, proton is not something we should look up to. Blender is a great example of a thing where various people contribute and somehow nobody needs to suck off facebook, the thing works and is getting better, usually listens to their community, there is no bullshit corporate structure and a ceo that needs his parachute gilded etc

        • Ilandar@aussie.zone
          2·
          3 months ago

          The private AI writing assistant is a feature recently announced for Proton Mail. A browser would be an entirely new service.

          • mayooooo@beehaw.org
            4·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, but we’re talking trust here. Why should they do privacy if they already give your data to some llm thing?

            • Ilandar@aussie.zone
              5·
              3 months ago

              Did you even bother to read about how it works or did you just skip straight to the hysteria? Proton Scribe runs locally on the device and it does not use your inputs for training. No data is sent to the cloud or third-parties.

                • Ilandar@aussie.zone
                  3·
                  3 months ago

                  In which case it runs on no-log servers. Support is coming for other browsers and the Proton Mail desktop app is already supported on macOS. Of course, all of this ignores the even greater point that this is an entirely optional feature that no one has to use. Personally I will be ignoring it completely.

              • mayooooo@beehaw.org
                2·
                3 months ago

                No, the point is in having a for profit org and something like the blender foundation. It’s about trust, not just the crappy llm thing, about the thing where they say everybody wants this

  • Sina@beehaw.org
    13·
    2 months ago

    Mozilla, please refocus the resources to improve performance, or let FF disappear!

    This whole thing with the private data collection is meaningless, if the browser is increasingly niche.

  • hedge@beehaw.orgEnglish
    9·
    3 months ago

    Does anyone know if the PPA/Personal Pan Pizza Privacy/Whatever thing has an about:config entry or is it controlled from about:preferences#privacy?

    EDIT: To answer my own question, the about:config entry is “dom.private-attribution.submission.enabled” which should be set to “false”; for those of us who use arkenfox, you should add this to your user-overrides.js file and then run the updater:

    user_pref(“dom.private-attribution.submission.enabled”, false); // Disable Privacy-Preserving Attribution

    This is correct AFAICT.

    EDIT EDIT: Also, possibly naive question: Why can’t Mozilla/Firefox just ask for donations like Wikipedia does instead of sneaking around, which they sort of seem to do once in a while?

    • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
      10·
      3 months ago
      1. PPA doesn’t make Mozilla money.
      2. Firefox is developed by Mozilla Corp, which can’t take donations. Mozilla Foundation does do fundraising drives, but that’s mostly for their public advocacy (which, ironically, may be where the idea for PPA originated).
      3. PPA has a checkbox in about:preferences.
      • hedge@beehaw.orgEnglish
        3·
        3 months ago

        1. Ok (um, then they do it why?) My attention has been really divided for the past couple days, so I haven’t really read very deeply into PPA.

        2. Didn’t know that; maybe they should reconfigure themselves to be more like Wikipedia? 🤷 It seems like Wikipedia has way more users than FF, and they’re able to keep going on the small donations they request from time to time.

        3. Indeed it does! And it might be nice if it wasn’t checked by default like it was in mine, but ok, I guess.

        Also, what have hamsters ever done to you? 😉

  • ahal@lemmy.ca
    8·
    3 months ago

    This is the best take I’ve seen on the whole kerfuffle so far.

  • FIash Mob #5678@beehaw.org
    5·
    3 months ago

    I dunno.

    I’m kind of enjoying watching Firefox users have to eat a little crow, since they troll the shit out of me every time I talk about Brave.

    • LukeZaz@beehaw.orgEnglish
      16·
      3 months ago

      This really doesn’t make Brave look any better though, seeing as it has its own version of “privacy-focused” attention-monetization schemes (Basic Attention Tokens) and its own fair share of controversies. Not to mention being Chromium under the hood and being developed by a company headed by Brandon Eich of all people — a massive homophobe.

      None of which make Firefox impeccable or ever did. But all of which made Brave decidedly worse to me, including after this all happened.